Mike Pence Won’t Dine Alone With A Woman Who’s Not His Wife. Is That Sexist?


A week ago, the Washington Post profiled second woman Karen Pence, a faithful Christian and committed spouse who is, as the story put it, her significant other’s “supplication warrior,” “gut check” and “shield.”

Ashley Parker, the journalist, noticed that Vice President Mike Pence once had disclosed to The Hill, a political daily paper and site, that he never feasts with ladies alone, nor does he go to capacities without his significant other if liquor is being served.

Image result for Mike Pence won't dine alone with a woman who's not his wife. Is that sexist?

This goody flew off the page like a start from a consuming log. Twitter, which is dependably profoundly burnable, detonated.

Was this an indication of conjugal commitment and regard? Or then again a flag that the Pences don’t confide in Mike Pence to be distant from everyone else with a lady? Or on the other hand maybe don’t confide in a lady to be separated from everyone else with Mike Pence?

I figured this fusty-appearing practice must spring from the couple’s notable religiosity.

They were hitched in the Catholic church, later wound up zealous Christians and as often as possible discuss their confidence. Mike Pence frequently depicts himself as “a Christian, a moderate and a Republican, in a specific order.”

A few people said the VP essentially was following the “Billy Graham govern” — made by the well known evangelist in 1948, when he was out and about converting. Graham and his male associates pledged to stay away from circumstances that would “have even the presence of bargain or doubt.”

On the off chance that you don’t go out to supper with a lady, it’s difficult to have a lady be your battle director or your head of staff. I trust this is sex separation.

Evacuating enticement (as ladies) from men is a staple of numerous male centric beliefs. A straight, wedded man won’t be enticed to stray on the off chance that he doesn’t invest energy alone with an inconsequential lady. Obviously, it won’t prevent a man from yearning in his heart. However, that is not the organ we’re stressed over, I presume.

There is really a more vital rule in question here, and one that rises above the Pences’ — or any other individual’s — bond.

According to the law and the administration, ladies are equivalent to men. They are meriting a similar working environment openings that generally have introduced themselves to men.

In the event that expert ladies and men can’t be separated from everyone else together, ladies are the ones who will pay a cost. They won’t have the sort of coaching that advances work environment headway. They won’t build up similar sorts of associations with supervisors that their male partners do.

They will miss out.

“I trust this is sexual orientation segregation,” said Kim Elsesser, 52, a UCLA instructor on sex and brain research who established an exclusive quantitative fence investments at Morgan Stanley subsequent to moving on from Vassar and MIT. “On the off chance that you don’t go out to supper with a lady, it’s difficult to have a lady be your crusade administrator or your head of staff or whoever you have to frequently meet with.”

Presently, perhaps I’m only a typical Jezebel. In any case, I, a solitary lady, regularly invest energy alone with wedded men over the span of my work.

I get them espresso. I take them to lunch. Now and again, flirt that I am, I even drink wine with them at supper.

Regularly, when I am downtown, I will entice a wedded male partner into my office. (I have such a large number of to browse!)


We don’t state anything until the point that I close the entryway. We take a seat. We look straight into each other’s eyes.

And after that we discuss work.

In 2015, National Journal directed a mysterious review getting some information about their encounters as congressional staff members. Were there any points of interest to being a lady? Had they at any point experienced sexism?

Focal points were generally shallow, as indicated by the reactions. One lady said she was dealt with preferable by security monitors over her male partners. Another said that Republican congressmen appeared to get a kick out of the chance to have ladies as representatives.

In any case, the inconveniences were distinct, especially when it came to issues like being separated from everyone else with their male supervisors:

“There is a lot of partiality in my office. The ladies work the hardest and the men get every one of the advantages, the high-profiled trips with my supervisor, more noteworthy access to the White House and lofty contacts. It’s a young men club, and the ladies are once in a while welcomed.”

“There was an office decide that I couldn’t be separated from everyone else with the congressman. The run was to ensure him and me, yet regardless it felt out of line.”

“My previous supervisor never took a shut entryway meeting with me in the traverse of working for him, on and off, finished a 12-year extend. Notwithstanding when I was in a place of senior administration. This made delicate and vital discourses to a great degree troublesome.”

In her 2016 book “Sex and the Office,” Elsesser authored the expression “sex segment” to depict this dynamic.

“It’s a fake boundary amongst people at work,” she said. Male subordinates who can invest energy alone with their supervisors will create further connections.

“Clearly,” said Elsesser, “when it comes time for advancements, who will get them?”

While we’ve been occupied with a discourse about whether it’s fitting for men to abstain from being distant from everyone else with their female partners and subordinates, we’ve additionally been inundated with new stories of terrible male conduct over at the Fox News Network.

A weekend ago, the New York Times distributed a first page examination concerning badgering affirmations against Fox star Bill O’Reilly. It detailed that five ladies had achieved settlements totaling $13 million with the system or O’Reilly by and by. (No less than two of the system’s settlements, the Times detailed, were come to after Fox evacuated long-term Chairman Roger Ailes in the wake of lewd behavior asserts by two dozen ladies.)

“One thing that struck me about these stories were the remarks I’ve perused, ” Elsesser said. “They say: ‘Ladies are disturbed in light of the fact that they are getting sexually irritated, and now they are vexed that this person [Pence] is maintaining a strategic distance from connections with them. You can’t make them glad.’”

So are men cursed in the event that they do and accursed on the off chance that they don’t?

Short answer: No.


Longer answer: Hell, no. Ladies need to be dealt with as working environment equivalents, and they would prefer not to be sexually bothered. In the event that you are a man and this strikes you as unreasonable, vague or accursing, maybe you don’t have a place in the work environment by any means.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.